Prescribing cascades of antigout medications from thiazide diuretics in gout-naïve hypertensive adults receiving first-line pharmacological management.

Prescribing cascade is a significant clinical problem but is often overlooked. We explore the incidence of the prescribing cascades of antigout medications related to thiazide treatment in gout-naïve hypertensive adults newly exposed to the pharmacological treatment. This population-based, retrospective cohort study used the Taiwan National Health Insurance Registry Database. Gout-naïve hypertensive adults who were newly dispensed first-line antihypertensive drugs between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2016, were enrolled. Patients were divided into the thiazide group (n = 4192) and the non-thiazide group (n = 81,083). The non-thiazide group included patients who received an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin II receptor blocker, calcium channel blocker, or beta-blocker. The study utilized propensity score matching and multivariable Cox regression models to investigate the prescribing cascade of antigout agents following antihypertensive treatment, adjusting for factors like age, sex, comorbidities, and concurrent medications. After propensity score matching, each group consisted of 4045 patients, with the thiazide group exhibiting a higher risk of being prescribed antigout medications across different time intervals post-treatment initiation. Specifically, adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for the thiazide group were 2.23, 2.07, and 2.41 for < 30 days, 31-180 days, and > 180 days, respectively, indicating a sustained and significant risk over time. Comparative analyses revealed thiazide diuretics were associated with a higher risk of antigout medication prescriptions compared to other antihypertensive classes, particularly evident after 180 days. Subgroup analyses across various demographics and comorbidities consistently showed an increased risk in the thiazide cohort. Gout-naïve hypertensive adults newly dispensed thiazide had a higher risk of subsequently adding antigout agents than those taking other first-line antihypertensive medications. The awareness and interruption of these prescribing cascades are critical to improving patient safety.

Circulating microRNA Biomarkers of Thiazide Response in Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Thiazide diuretics are the second most frequently prescribed class of antihypertensives, but up to 50% of patients with hypertension have minimal antihypertensive response to thiazides. We explored circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) in search of predictive biomarkers of thiazide response. METHODS AND RESULTS: We profiled 754 miRNAs in baseline plasma samples of 36 hypertensive European American adults treated with hydrochlorothiazide, categorized into responders (n=18) and nonresponders (n=18) on the basis of diastolic blood pressure response to hydrochlorothiazide. miRNAs with ≥2.5-fold differential expression between responders and nonresponders were considered for validation in 3 cohorts (n=50 each): hydrochlorothiazide-treated European Americans, chlorthalidone-treated European Americans, and hydrochlorothiazide-treated Black individuals. Different blood pressure phenotypes including categorical (responder versus nonresponder) and continuous diastolic blood pressure and systolic blood pressure were tested for association with the candidate miRNA expression using multivariate regression analyses adjusting for age, sex, and baseline blood pressure. After quality control, 74 miRNAs were available for screening, 19 of which were considered for validation. In the validation cohort, miR-193b-3p and 30d-5p showed significant associations with continuous SBP or diastolic blood pressure response or both, to hydrochlorothiazide in European Americans at Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted P<0.05. In the combined analysis of validation cohorts, let-7g (odds ratio, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.4-0.8]), miR-142-3p (odds ratio, 1.1 [95% CI, 1.0, 1.2]), and miR-423-5p (odds ratio, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.5-0.9]) associated with categorical diastolic blood pressure response at Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted P<0.05. Predicted target genes of the 5 miRNAs were mapped to key hypertension pathways: lysine degradation, fatty acid biosynthesis, and metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: The above identified circulating miRNAs may have a potential for clinical use as biomarkers for thiazide diuretic selection in hypertension. REGISTRATION: URL: ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT00246519, NCT01203852, NCT00005520.

[Thiazid diuretics : some useful considerations in clinical practice]. / Diurétiques thiazidiques. Quelques considérations utiles en pratique clinique.

Thiazide diuretics are an essential part of the treatment of hypertension, which affects nearly a third of the world's population. Hydrochlorothiazide is the most widely used member of this class, due to its long availability on the market and the many combinations available with other substances. Other analogues of this class exist, with notable advantages from a clinical point of view, recognized under the name of thiazide-like. This article reviews some of the considerations in clinical practice concerning the different types of thiazides currently available in Switzerland.

Les diurétiques thiazidiques font partie des traitements de premier choix dans la prise en charge de l'hypertension artérielle, touchant près d'un tiers de la population mondiale. L'hydrochlorothiazide est le représentant de cette classe médicamenteuse le plus utilisé dans les combinaisons antihypertensives en Suisse. D'autres analogues de cette classe existent sur le marché, avec des avantages notables du point de vue clinique, reconnus sous la dénomination de thiazides-like. Le choix de l'utilisation d'un diurétique thiazidique repose avant tout sur les indications et les contre-indications relatives à cette classe. Cet article propose une revue de quelques considérations en pratique clinique sur les différents types de thiazides actuellement disponibles en Suisse.

Diuretic Tolerance to Repeated-Dose Furosemide in Infants Born Very Preterm with Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the presence and timing of furosemide diuretic tolerance in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), and to determine if tolerance is modified by thiazide co-administration. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study among infants born very preterm with BPD exposed to repeated-dose furosemide for 72 hours, measuring net fluid balance (total intake minus total output) as a surrogate of diuresis in the 3 days before and after exposure. The primary comparison was the difference in fluid balance between the first and third 24 hours of furosemide exposure. We fit a general linear model for within-subject repeated measures of fluid balance over time, with thiazide co-administration as an interaction variable. Secondary analyses included an evaluation of weight trajectories over time. RESULTS: In 83 infants, median fluid balance ranged between + 43.6 and + 52.7 ml/kg/d in the 3 days prior to furosemide exposure. Fluid balance decreased to a median of + 29.1 ml/kg/d in the first 24 hours after furosemide, but then increased to +47.5 ml/kg/d by the third 24-hour interval, consistent with tolerance (P < .001). Thiazides did not modify the change in fluid balance during furosemide exposure for any time-period. Weight decreased significantly in the first 24 hours after furosemide and increased thereafter (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The net fluid balance response to furosemide decreases rapidly during repeated-dose exposures in infants with BPD, consistent with diuretic tolerance. Clinicians should consider this finding in the context of an infant's therapeutic goals. Further research efforts to identify safe and effective furosemide dosage strategies are needed.

[Efficacy and Organoprotection of Triple Combinations in the Treatment of Arterial Hypertension].

The 2022 draft Russian guidelines on arterial hypertension recommend initiation of antihypertensive therapy with a combination of drugs in most patients with blood pressure above 150 / 90 mm Hg and / or in the presence of high-risk criteria. In 2021, the results of a 12-year analysis of the Brisighella Heart Study (BHS) were published. The aim of this study was to compare the use of different triple antihypertensive drug combinations in an Italian cohort of patients in real-life clinical practice. Combination antihypertensive therapy with a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor, amlodipine, and thiazide/thiazide-like diuretics provides a better blood pressure control compared to other antihypertensive drug combinations. The use of the triple combination of amlodipine/indapamide/perindopril is associated with a better metabolic profile than any other considered combination of antihypertensive drugs and a more pronounced organ-protective effect.

Thiazides do not affect mortality but may reduce CV events vs. nondiuretic antihypertensive drugs at up to 5 y.

SOURCE CITATION: Reinhart M, Puil L, Salzwedel DM, et al. First-line diuretics versus other classes of antihypertensive drugs for hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;7:CD008161. 37439548.

[Thiazides to prevent recurrence of kidney stones: is hydrochlorothiazide still indicated?] / Thiazidediuretica ter preventie van recidiverende nierstenen.

Thiazides are widely used to prevent recurrence of calcium-containing kidney stones. However, the recent NOSTONE trial reported no benefit of hydrochlorothiazide on the composite outcome of symptomatic or radiologic recurrence. Higher doses (25 and 50mg daily) resulted in a decrease of radiologic recurrence, but no difference in symptomatic stones. Current guidelines preserve the use of hydrochlorothiazide to patients with overt hypercalciuria, while NOSTONE also included patients without hypercalciuria. This might have underestimated the effect of hydrochlorothiazide. While patients received dietary counseling, results suggest adherence was poor e.g. with respect to oxalate and salt consumption, possibly mitigating a potential beneficial hypocalciuric effect of hydrochlorothiazide. Furthermore, previous studies that did show an effect of thiazides on stone recurrence used higher doses. Thus, while hydrochlorothiazide might not be effective in all patients with calcium-containing kidney stones, it should not be written off, as its efficacy in overt hypercalciuria needs to be further elucidated.

Long-term comparative effectiveness of antihypertensive monotherapies in primary prevention of cardiovascular events: a population-based retrospective inception cohort study in the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term effectiveness of antihypertensive monotherapies in primary prevention of cardiovascular events. DESIGN: Retrospective inception cohort study covering a 25-year study period. SETTING: University Groningen IADB.nl pharmacy prescription database with data from 1996 to 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 18 years or older, free of any cardiovascular disease (CVD) drug therapies prior to initiation of a preventive antihypertensive monotherapy (ACE inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), beta-blockers (BBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and thiazides). OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was the time to first prescription of acute cardiac drug therapy (CDT) measured by valid drug proxies to identify a first major CVD event in patients without a history of CVD. RESULTS: Among 33 427 initiators, 5205 (15.6%) patients experienced an acute CDT. The average follow-up time was 7.9±5.5 years. The 25-year incidence rate per 1000 person-years were 25.3, 22.4, 18.2, 24.4 and 22.0 for ACEI, ARB, BB, CCB and thiazide starters, respectively. Inverse probability of treatment-weighted Cox regression showed that thiazide starters had lower hazards than the reference BB starters (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.95). Among patients on diabetes drugs, risks were lower (HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.85). CCB starters had higher hazards than reference BB (HR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.36). The overall estimated number needed to treat for thiazides compared with BBs to prevent one acute CDT in 25 years was 26, and four among patients on diabetes drugs. CONCLUSIONS: After adjustments for confounders, patients starting on monotherapy with thiazides had a lower incidence of CDT compared with those starting on BBs, notably among patients on diabetes drugs. Conversely, patients who began CCB monotherapy had a higher incidence of CDT compared with those starting on BBs. Other monotherapies had comparable incidence of cardiovascular disease compared with BBs.

Thiazide diuretics alone or combined with potassium-sparing diuretics to treat hypertension: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The magnitude of blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects and decrease of the adverse effects of thiazide diuretics provided by potassium-sparing diuretics remain uncertain. The aim of this study was to compare the BP-lowering efficacy and the incidence of adverse effects of high (T+) and low-dose (T-) thiazide diuretics, alone or combined with high (PS+) or low-dose (PS-) potassium-sparing diuretics in patients with primary hypertension. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and LILACS. Randomized double-blind placebo or active-controlled trials (RCT) with 3 weeks to 1 year of follow-up were included. Sample size, mean and standard deviation from baseline, follow-up and change from baseline values were extracted by two independent reviewers. Pairwise random effect models and Bayesian network meta-analysis models were used to compare the effects of treatments. The risk of bias in individual studies was assessed using the Rob 1.0 tool. The primary outcome was the mean difference in office SBP. Secondary outcomes were the mean difference in biochemical parameters and the incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-six double-blind RCTs involving 58 807 participants (mean age: 55 years; 45% women) were included. All treatment groups were more effective than placebo in lowering BP, with mean differences (MDs) of change from baseline ranging from -7.66 mmHg [95% credible interval (95% CrI), -8.53 to -6.79] for T- to -12.77 mmHg (95% CrI, -15.22 to -10.31) for T+PS-. T+ alone or combined with potassium-sparing was more effective in reducing BP than T-. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) estimated ranking showed that the best effectiveness in lowering SBP was found for T+PS- (0.69), T+PS+ (0.65) and T+ (0.54). Compared with placebo, all treatments (except T-PS-) were associated with more potassium reduction and T+ compared with all other treatments and T- when compared with T-PS-. Compared with placebo, all active treatments (except T+PS+) showed higher elevations of uric acid. The increase of plasma glucose promoted by thiazides alone was reduced by potassium-sparing agents. CONCLUSION: Thiazides with potassium-sparing diuretics are associated with increased BP-lowering efficacy compared with thiazides alone while minimizing hypokalaemia and hyperglycaemia. These findings demonstrate that thiazide and potassium-sparing diuretic combination is preferable to thiazide alone in treating hypertension.

Influence of administration time and sex on natriuretic, diuretic, and kaliuretic effects of diuretics.

Sex differences in renal function and blood pressure have been widely described across many species. Blood pressure dips during sleep and peaks in the early morning. Similarly, glomerular filtration rate, filtered electrolyte loads, urine volume, and urinary excretion all exhibit notable diurnal rhythms, which reflect, in part, the regulation of renal transporter proteins by circadian clock genes. That regulation is sexually dimorphic; as such, sex and time of day are not two independent regulators of kidney function and blood pressure. The objective of the present study was to assess the effect of sex and administration time on the natriuretic and diuretic effects of loop, thiazide, and K+-sparing diuretics, which are common treatments for hypertension. Loop diuretics inhibit Na+-K+-2Cl- cotransporters on the apical membrane of the thick ascending limb, thiazide diuretics inhibit Na+-Cl- cotransporters on the distal convoluted tubule, and K+-sparing diuretics inhibit epithelial Na+ channels on the connecting tubule and collecting duct. We simulated Na+ transporter inhibition using sex- and time-of-day-specific computational models of mouse kidney function. The simulation results highlighted significant sex and time-of-day differences in the drug response. Loop diuretics induced larger natriuretic and diuretic effects during the active phase. The natriuretic and diuretic effects of thiazide diuretics exhibited sex and time-of-day differences, whereas these effects of K+-sparing diuretics exhibited a significant time-of-day difference in females only. The kaliuretic effect depended on the type of diuretics and time of administration. The present computational models can be a useful tool in chronotherapy, to tailor drug administration time to match the body's diurnal rhythms to optimize the drug effect.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Sex influences cardiovascular disease, and the timing of onset of acute cardiovascular events exhibits circadian rhythms. Kidney function also exhibits sex differences and circadian rhythms. How do the natriuretic and diuretic effects of diuretics, a common treatment for hypertension that targets the kidneys, differ between the sexes? And how do these effects vary during the day? To answer these questions, we conducted computer simulations to assess the effects of loop, thiazide, and K+-sparing diuretics.

Effectiveness of thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics in advanced chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Thiazide diuretics are first-line drugs for the treatment of hypertension, but hypertension treatment guidelines have systematically discouraged their use in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). For the first time, a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis were performed to assess the effectiveness of thiazides and thiazide-like diuretics to treat hypertension in patients with stages 3b, 4, and 5 CKD. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis that included a literature search using the following databases were performed: MEDLINE through PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) through the Cochrane Library, Embase, and ISI - Web of Science (all databases). Prospective studies that evaluated the effectiveness of thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics in individuals with a GFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 were included. RESULTS: Five clinical trials, totaling 214 participants, were included, and the mean GFR ranged from 13.0 ± 5.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 to 26.8 ± 8.8 mL/min/1.73 m2. There was evidence of a reduction in mean blood pressure and in GFR, as well as in fractional sodium excretion and fractional chloride excretion. CONCLUSION: Thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics seem to maintain their effectiveness in lowering blood pressure in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. These findings should spur new prospective randomized trials and spark discussions, particularly about upcoming hypertension guidelines.

The Use of Thiazide Diuretics for the Treatment of Hypertension in Patients With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.

The use of thiazide diuretics for the treatment of hypertension in patients with advance chronic kidney disease. Thiazides have been recommended as the first-line for the treatment of hypertension, yet their use has been discouraged in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), as they are suggested to be ineffective in advanced CKD. Recent data suggest that thiazide diuretics may be beneficial blood pressure control in addition to natriuresis in existing CKD. This review discusses the commercially available thiazides with a focus on thiazide pharmacology, most common adverse effects, clinical uses of thiazide diuretic, and the evidence for efficacy of thiazide use in advanced CKD.

Antihypertensive Medication Regimens Used in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.

BACKGROUND: Describing the antihypertensive medication regimens used in the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) would contextualize the standard and intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) interventions and may inform future implementation efforts to achieve population-wide intensive SBP goals. METHODS: We included SPRINT participants with complete medication data at the prerandomization and 12-month visits. Regimens were categorized by antihypertensive medication class. Analyses were stratified by treatment group (standard goal SBP <140 mm Hg versus intensive goal SBP <120 mm Hg). RESULTS: Among 7860 participants (83.7% of 9361 randomized), the median number of classes used at the prerandomization visit was 2.0 and 2.0 in the standard and intensive groups (P=0.559). At 12-months, the median number of classes used was 3.0 and 2.0 in the intensive and standard groups (P<0.001). Prerandomization, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE), or angiotensin-II receptor blocker (ARB) monotherapy was the most common regimen in the intensive and standard groups (12.6% versus 12.2%). At 12-months, ACE/ARB monotherapy was still the most common regimen among standard group participants (14.7%) and was used by 5.3% of intensive group participants. Multidrug regimens used by the intensive and standard participants at 12 months were as follows: an ACE/ARB with thiazide (12.2% and 7.9%); an ACE/ARB with calcium channel blocker (6.2% and 6.8%); an ACE/ARB, thiazide, and calcium channel blocker (11.4% and 4.3%); and an ACE/ARB, thiazide, calcium channel blocker, and beta-blocker (6.5% and 1.2%). CONCLUSIONS: SPRINT investigators favored combining ACEs or ARBs, thiazide diuretics, and calcium channel blockers to target SBP <120 mm Hg, compared to ACE/ARB monotherapy to target SBP <140 mm Hg. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01206062.

The clinical impact of anti-hypertensive treatment drug-gene pairs in the asian population: a systematic review of publications in the past decade.

Pharmacogenetics play an important role in determining the anti-hypertensive effects of blood pressure-lowering medications and have the potential to improve future patient care. Current literature on the topic, however, has a heavy focus on Caucasians and may not be generalisable to the Asian populations. Therefore, we have conducted this systematic review to summarise and evaluate the literature of the past decade. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant studies from 1 January 2011 to 23 July 2021. The outcome of interest was the response to anti-hypertensive treatment in Asians according to each genetic polymorphism. A total of 26 studies with a total of 8837 patients were included in our review, covering five classes of anti-hypertensive agents-namely, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), beta-blockers (BB), calcium channel blockers (CCB), and thiazide-like diuretics. Response to ACEI therapy was most susceptible to genotypic variations, while the efficacy of ARB and CCB were affected by pharmacogenetic differences to varying extent. For BB, only variations in the ADRB1 genotype significantly affects therapeutic response, while the therapeutic efficacy of thiazide-like diuretics was correlated with genotypic variations in the REN and ACE. This systematic review evaluated the impact of pharmacogenetic variations on the therapeutic efficacy of anti-hypertensive treatment in Asians and has described numerous drug-gene pairs that are potentially clinically important. Future prospective studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are needed to better elucidate the impact of these drug-gene pairs.

Use of Thiazides to Treat Hypertension and Advanced CKD.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hypertension is often difficult to control in patients with CKD as manifested by suboptimal control rates in this population. Use of thiazides in CKD patients has been limited as these agents are thought to be ineffective in reducing blood pressure in people with advanced CKD. This review summarizes recent studies impacting indications and safety of use of thiazide in patients with CKD and discusses the mechanism of how thiazides reduce blood pressure. RECENT FINDINGS: Chlorthalidone reduces blood pressure compared to placebo in patients with advanced CKD, challenging the belief that thiazide diuretics lose efficacy at lower levels of GFR. Recent clinical trial data indicate that thiazides are effective in patients with advanced kidney disease for blood pressure lowering. However, monitoring of electrolytes and kidney function is important to ensure patient safety when prescribing these agents in patients with CKD.

[Treatment of patients with arterial hypertension in clinical practice in 2010-2020 (according to the national register of hypertension)].

AIM: To analyze therapy in patients with arterial hypertension (AH) in 20102020. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of hypertensive patients observed in primary health care, entered into the base of hypertension registry for 20102020 years in the whole group (n=44 653) and in a separate subgroup of hypertensive patients in the absence of: ischemic heart disease, a history of myocardial infarction, chronic heart failure (n=20 569). RESULTS: About 80% of hypertensive patients are patients of high and very high risks (from 2010 to 2020, the proportion of very high cardiovascular risk (CVR) increased from 18.1 to 57.3%). The number of hypertensive patients with a history of myocardial infarction increased in 5 times, in 3 times with ischemic heart disease and with chronic heart failure. The number of prescribed drugs increased: mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (in 5.8 times), loop diuretics (in 7.2) angiotensin receptor blockers (in 3 times), b-adrenoblockers, calcium channel blockers of the dihydropyridine series, thiazide-like diuretics in 2 times. Patients at high and very high risk are more likely reached target blood pressure values. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were prescribed in more than 70% of patients with hypertension and the absence of coronary heart disease, chronic heart failure, history of myocardial infarction; the prescription of b-adrenoblockers, angiotension receptor blockers, thiazide-like and loop diuretics increased. CONCLUSION: The proportion of more severe and comorbid patients has increased in observed in primary health care patients with AH over a 10-year period (20102020). This was probably the main factor of increasing antihypertensive therapy and prescribing drugs with additional indications and improving the achievement of target blood pressure in patients with high and very high cardiovascular risk.

Pairwise comparison of hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone responses among hypertensive patients.

This study conducted a pairwise comparison of antihypertensive and metabolic effects of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and chlorthalidone (CTD) at 25 mg/day in the same individuals to address the clinical dilemma on preferred thiazide for hypertension (HTN) management. We included 15 African American (AA) and 35 European American (EA) patients with HTN treated with HCTZ and CTD as part of the Pharmacogenomic Evaluation of Antihypertensive Responses (PEAR) and PEAR-2 trials, respectively. Mean reduction in systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) with HCTZ versus CTD was 8/5 versus 16/8 mmHg among EA patients (p < 1.0e-5 SBP, p = 0.002 DBP) and 11/8 versus 20/11 mmHg among AA patients (p = 0.03 SBP, p = 0.22 DBP). While CTD showed clinically meaningful benefit over HCTZ in two-thirds of participants with respect to SBP reduction and half of EA patients with respect to DBP reduction, a majority of AA patients (53%) showed similar DBP reduction with both thiazides. Sixty percent of AA patients and 29% of EA patients attained blood pressure (BP) <140/90 mmHg with both thiazides. Mean potassium (K+) reduction was greater with CTD compared to HCTZ both in EA patients (mean difference = 0.35, p = 0.0002) and AA patients (0.49, p = 0.043). While 31% of AA patients developed severe hypokalemia on CTD, <5% of others developed severe hypokalemia. Although 46% of AA patients on CTD required K+ supplementation, only 6%-11% of others required supplementation. Overall, in the majority of EA patients, CTD was superior to HCTZ, whereas among AA patients, it was superior in a minority, and was associated with significant potassium-related risk, suggesting that guideline preferences for CTD over HCTZ are reasonable in EA patients but may be less reasonable in AA patients, particularly if the target is <140/90 mmHg.